Whether it’s a blessing or a curse says probably more about the owner than Apple, but I find that their non-production of documentation is a rather frustrating thing. See, I like to read the manual, forget everything it says, go on a voyage of discovery, then go back and refer to the manual when I have a specific problem.

I find the Apple missing manual phenomenon frustrating because I can sometimes own a product for two years and not know that it does something really funky. This post is about one such thing.

In the iOS Camera app, on devices with autofocus cameras (iPhone 4, 4S, iPad 3, perhaps some of the Touches) you can tap on the viewfinder screen to create an autofocus point. The camera refocuses the image on that point which is dead useful when the device seems unwilling/unable to get a focus lock on the image.

My discovery is this: The tap-to-autofocus also causes the camera to re-meter the scene, using a point-weighted average.

Take this shot for example. Yes, it’s presented as a grainy black & white, but it’s actually a composite of  two images. (see bigger here)

The reason for this is that the human eye is actually a pretty trick bit of kit. The difference between what we can differentiate in shadows and what we can differentiate in extreme lighting (our dynamic range) is massively greater than that of any camera. Film or digital, multi-thousand-pound-pro SLR or wretched phone camera.

For photographers, this is a bit of a nightmare. We set the camera up to show detail in the ground, and it just goes & gives up on the blue sky with its beautiful fluffy clouds, showing the whole lot as a white sheet. Or we set it to show the sky, and the ground features disappear in a shadowy murk.

The way to get around this is with compositing. Either in-camera with a graduated filter, or in Photoshop (other editors are available) with multiple shots blended together. Take one shot where the sky is great (murky ground) and one shot where the ground is great (white sky). Then put them together in Photoshop.

The shot above required such a technique. The only way to get the white of the snow, the malevolence of the clouds, and the ground detail (all of which the eye can perceive) into one shot was to composite it. But who knew an iPhone had the right software built in to give you the control you need to make such a shot? Note: using “HDR mode” will not achieve this.

Compositing is hard though. The most common method to get the phone to change the exposure is to recompose the image. It runs what photography manuals call a “centre-weighted average” metering mode. It looks at the whole scene, and pays particular attention to the centre of the image. If you want it to change the brightness of the image, just recompose the image to move the centre point.

But this will cause you all kinds of problems in post-production, because you’ll have a much harder job matching your multiple exposures up to create a coherent scene. Changing the angle of the shot alters the perspective, so you won’t necessarily be able to match sky and ground consistently. This’ll show itself up in weirdness around the horizon, with some trees or buildings ghosting in the composite.

What you need is the ability to make the same shot over and over again at different exposure levels. And you can actually do this in the iPhone with what I’ve come to refer to as “tap to meter”.

Look at the following sequence of photos. In each, the shot is unedited, save for being resized. I’ve placed a red box in the zone I tapped to meter the scene.


In each case, the overall brightness of the image is radically different, as the phone takes my tap instruction and tries to weight the overall image brightness to make my tap point the mid-level of the image. But the composition of the image itself is unchanged.

This makes compositing easy. If you can hold the phone relatively still while you tap to re-meter and then reshoot, your matching exercise (precisely overlaying each image) should be simplicity itself. Then you can pick the brightnesses you need to make the image level correspond with what you saw, compensating for your camera’s ineptitude.

If you want some more information on how to actually do the compositing, leave me a note in the comments.

 

 

Orion is one of the most readily identifiable constellations in the night sky. Most visible in winter, when it’s a night-time feature of the sky, Orion is easily located via its triumvirate of aligned stars, known as Orion’s Belt.

Orion, Jupiter and Venus

In this first shot, Orion is left-of-frame, with Jupiter and Venus in close attendance with each other on the right.

In this second shot, the streak under Orion is the International Space Station, crossing completely under the massive constellation in a mere forty seconds.

ISS Underscores Orion

Orion’s Stars

Surrounding Orion’s belt are four other stars, held to be Orion’s shoulders and feet. His highest shoulder (right, facing the observer) is the red supergiant Betelgeuse, some 640 light years from Earth. It is the eight-brightest star in the night sky. The blue giant Bellatrix is Orion’s left shoulder, and is maybe the 22nd brightest star in the sky (accounts vary).  It is a blue-white because it burns considerably hotter than the sun, and is only 250 light years from Earth. Orion’s left foot, Rigel, is the brightest star of the constellation, considered to be around 860 light years from Earth. Rigel is actually a binary system, with the Rigel B star’s brightness dwarfed by the A star. Saiph (Kappa Orionis) is reckoned to be around 650 light years from Earth, and is 22x larger than our Sun. Saiph is the sixth-brightest star in Orion, although the majority of Sapih’s brightness is in the ultraviolet spectrum, and thus not visible to the human eye.

Orion’s Belt

Orion’s Belt consists of Alnitak, Alnilam and Mintaka (left to right). Altitak is 100,000 times brighter than the sun. It is approximately 800 light years from Earth. Alnilam is much further away – estimated to be 1,340 light years from Earth. It emits most of its light in the ultraviolet spectrum, totalling 375,000x more brightness than the Sun. Mintaka is 915 light years away and is in fact a binary system, with its two stars orbiting each other every 5.73 days.

In this third shot, Orion’s Belt is the three stars in a line pointing towards the top-right of frame.

Orion's Belt and Orion's Sword

The camera has resolved a number of stars not visible with the naked eye, and although this shot is taken at a relatively low zoom range of just 260mm, the top and middle stars of Orion’s Sword are already clearly distinguishably multiple stars.

Orion’s Sword and the M42 Nebula

I set out on this post to take photos of Orion’s sword. This appears to hang down below his belt, and appears as three stars. However, it’s much more complex than that, and with the naked eye, the middle “star” can be understood to be something else entirely. Indeed it is, the M42 nebula, held to be the most photographed nebula of all.

Orion's Sword at 520mm

At a 35mm focal length of 520mm, the lowest star is a singleton, the middle is a clear pair with a cloud surrounding it, and the upper star is a slightly more distant pair. The camera resolves a number of other stars not visible to the naked eye – at least not in a city with its light pollution.

Orion's Sword and the M42 Nebula

Zooming in further (1,040mm) we can clearly see the gas/dust clouds of the Orion nebula (lower-right-middle of frame) surrounding the brightest star, Zeta Orionis. Clearly I have more to research regarding the many other stars that the camera has resolved. However, I’m quite pleased to have clearly captured my first ever nebula. That’s enough for tonight!

Camera geekery…

All shot with a Canon EOS 1d MkIII on a Manfrotto 190 ProB tripod with a 390RC2 head and a Canon TC-80N3 remote.

  1. Lens: Canon EF16-35 F/2.8L II. 16mm. Exposure: 1.3s @ F/3.5 ISO 1600
  2. Lens: Canon EF24-105 F/4L IS. 24mm. Exposure: 5 frames at 8s @ F/6.3 ISO 800
  3. Lens: Canon EF100-400 F/4-5.6L IS plus EF2x MkII teleconverter. 200mm. 3.2s @ F/11 ISO 3200
  4. Lens: Canon EF400 F/5.6L. 400mm. 4s @ F/11 ISO 3200
  5. Lens: Canon EF400 F/5.6L plus EF2x MkII teleconverter. 800mm. 1.6s @ F/11 ISO 3200

Note that the text refers to zoom lengths including the 1.3x crop factor of the 1d MkIII camera body.

 

Frubes

This is a box of Frubes. Within are six little sachets of fruit-flavoured yoghurt. It’s entirely possible to envisage the tubes all standing to attention inside the box.

This is the general thrust of their television advertisement. It features a “General” Frube, who suggests that the Frubes are yoghurt soldiers, but that you are to “rip their heads off and suck their guts out”.

A Frube. This is the part where you rip its head off, as shown on the arrows (click to enlarge)

Which is exactly what you do to eat them. It’s a fun advert, gets over the key messages of yoghurt, fruit, and eating instructions. You rip off the tab at the top, and suck out the yoghurt from within the pouch. In the words of the inestimable Homer J Simpson, “it’s funny because it’s true.”

But not any longer. Now, the slogan has been changed to “pull their tops off and eat them all up.”

Seriously?

Someone’s complained about this advertisement? Somebody thinks it’s not funny?

This is what’s wrong with Society today. Everyone’s so damned keen to take offence at absolutely fucking everything that nothing can be simple fun any more. It’s so depressing.

© 2011 Observations of an Edinburgh Chap Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha